Navigating the Ethical Implications of Technology in Doctoral Studies

Dr. Eric A. Canny, Assistant Teaching Professor of Education at University of Southern California

A Faculty Perspective on Shaping Future Leaders

As technology revolutionizes doctoral studies, the ethical challenges it introduces have profound implications for academic research and the leadership roles these graduates will assume. As a faculty member in a doctoral program focused on senior leaders, I have observed how these challenges are not just theoretical; they deeply influence how our students approach their future roles as leaders.

Reflecting on my doctoral research, I recall a time when the internet was coming into being, and social media was in its infancy. The ethical challenges we faced then—such as the rapid spread of information, the potential for misinformation, and the initial concerns over data privacy—mirror some of the challenges our students face today with AI, data privacy, and global connectivity. The parallels are striking, and they serve as a reminder that while technology evolves, the core ethical questions often repeat, requiring each generation of scholars and leaders to find new ways to address them.

AI in Research: Building Ethical Awareness

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming research, enabling deeper data analysis and predictive insights. However, AI’s susceptibility to bias presents significant ethical concerns. In our program, doctoral students are learning to identify and mitigate these biases, which are crucial skills for ethical decision-making. As future leaders, they will need to apply this understanding to responsibly deploy AI in organizational contexts, ensuring fairness and equity in outcomes. When I was conducting my research, we grappled with the newfound power of the internet to aggregate data, and similar concerns about bias and misuse emerged. Today's students are continuing this important work in a new context.

“Learning to integrate intuition with analytics, our students are developing a more holistic approach to leadership, ensuring decisions are informed by both rigorous analysis and a nuanced understanding of complex human factors.”

Data Privacy and Security: Ethical Stewardship

Handling sensitive data is a key aspect of doctoral research, particularly in fields involving personal information. Protecting this data goes beyond technical skills; it requires a commitment to ethical stewardship. I see our students taking these responsibilities seriously, understanding that the principles they uphold in their research will translate directly to how they safeguard organizational integrity and stakeholder trust in their future careers. During my doctoral studies, the internet’s capacity to store and share information raised early concerns about privacy—concerns that have only intensified as technology has advanced. Today’s students are building on these early foundations, facing even more complex privacy challenges.

Addressing the Digital Divide: Advocating for Equity

The digital divide in access to technology poses an ethical challenge in academia and the workplace. Doctoral students who confront this issue gain a deeper appreciation for equity, which will inform their approach to leadership. As organizational leaders, they will be better equipped to advocate for inclusive policies that ensure all employees have access to the tools they need to succeed. I remember when access to the internet a significant barrier for many researchers was, and the same issue persists today, though in different forms. The lessons I learned then about equity and access are just as relevant now, as our students work to bridge new divides.

Intellectual Property and Integrity: Managing Innovation Ethically

The management of intellectual property (IP) and academic integrity in doctoral studies directly relates to ethical leadership in innovation. By navigating these issues, students develop an understanding of the balance between respecting contributions and fostering creativity. This balance is crucial for future leaders who must manage innovation while maintaining ethical standards in their organizations. In the early days of the internet, issues around IP were already emerging, and social media began to challenge traditional notions of ownership and authorship. The ethical dilemmas our students face today are extensions of those early questions, now amplified by the scale and speed of technological change.

Global Collaboration: Leading with Cultural Sensitivity

Global collaboration in doctoral research introduces ethical considerations related to fairness and cultural respect. Successfully managing these dynamics prepares students for leadership in an interconnected world. They will lead diverse teams with an understanding of the ethical complexities of global collaboration, ensuring equitable and culturally sensitive partnerships. As global communication expanded during my studies, we began to see the importance of cultural sensitivity in international collaborations—a lesson that is even more critical in today’s hyper-connected world.

Balancing Generalist and Specialist Roles in a Changing IT Landscape

As technology rapidly evolves, the roles of generalists and specialists in the workforce are increasingly intertwined. Doctoral students often face the challenge of whether to pursue deep expertise in a narrow field or maintain a broader, more adaptable skill set. This decision has significant implications for their future leadership roles. Leaders who are too specialized may miss the broader picture, while those who are too general may lack the depth needed to drive innovation. Our students are learning to balance these roles—leveraging broad knowledge to connect diverse ideas while also cultivating deep expertise in critical areas—preparing them to lead in dynamic environments where both specialization and adaptability are key. This balance was a challenge even in my time, as we navigated the early days of IT and its implications for research and leadership.

Intuition vs. Analytics: Finding the Right Balance as a Leader

In an era where data analytics is increasingly relied upon for decision-making, the role of intuition remains vital. Doctoral students trained to value empirical evidence must also recognize when to trust their instincts. Effective leadership often involves balancing data-driven insights with intuitive understanding, especially in situations where data may be incomplete or rapidly changing. By learning to integrate intuition with analytics, our students are developing a more holistic approach to leadership, ensuring that decisions are informed by both rigorous analysis and a nuanced understanding of complex human factors. I, too, had to learn this balance as I transitioned from relying on emerging digital tools to integrating them with my own judgment and experience.

Conclusion

The ethical challenges faced in doctoral studies are foundational experiences that shape future leaders. By addressing issues like AI bias, data privacy, the digital divide, and global collaboration, our doctoral students develop the ethical awareness necessary for responsible leadership. As technology continues to evolve, these future leaders will be equipped to navigate its implications with integrity and fairness, balancing the need for specialization and adaptability, and integrating both data-driven insights and intuitive judgment into their decision-making processes. The parallels between the challenges I faced during my own studies and those our students face today underscore the ongoing nature of these ethical dilemmas. As they navigate these issues, they are not just preparing for the future—they are poised to shape it.

Artificial Intelligence