Teaching Assessment for Student Inclusivity and Outcomes

Dr Lucian Tipi, Associate Dean Teaching, Education and Student Experience, Birmingham City University

Dr Lucian Tipi, Associate Dean Teaching, Education and Student Experience, Birmingham City University

In case anybody has missed it – here it is: the top priority for OfS and any UK HE institution is student outcomes. This can be further broken down into two main categories: employability and/or further study. A prerequisite for both of these is academic achievement – the grades on your transcript matter in the context in which an increasing number of people have a degree. But how are the grades achieved by students? Through their summative assessments, of course, particularly important being the assessments in terminal years.

As part of my Associate Dean role, student outcomes are, of course, at the top of my agenda. The logical statements above made me think quite hard about something that might sound obvious now – but are we doing it? To put it simply – are we doing all we can to ensure that our students are best placed to succeed in their assessments?

A cursory examination of HE academic practice gives an unequivocal answer to this question: No. Looking at schedules of teaching, we see plenty of time dedicated to teaching the technical subject matter but little, if any, time dedicated to teaching our assessment packages. So, the question then is this: are we expecting our very diverse students to understand assessments just on the basis of a brief (I’ll come back to this point a little later) and perhaps a screencast and a 20-minute in-class introduction? I would like to propose that we need to do better.

I would like to propose that we need an in-depth and deliberate approach to teaching assessment with the same enthusiasm as we do our subject matter.

Let's start with assessment briefs: how long should these be? In my recent practice, I have come across examples of briefs that were 12, 25, and 42 pages long. That’s not all – some assessment briefs are written in a style that would make any academic journal editor proud – dense and full of jargon. I think that by taking this approach, it is unrealistic to expect students to be able to cope. Assessment briefs need to be just that and free of any unnecessary jargon – I suggest no more than three pages long.

“I would like to propose that we need an in-depth and deliberate approach to teaching assessment with the same enthusiasm as we do our subject matter”

So now that we’ve got our briefs, the job is done? I don’t think so; there is a job of work to make sure that students get it. There seems to be a gap between what we teach students in their weekly sessions and how that might be translated into actual assessment. This is not a gap that can be filled by a one-off activity. The weekly schedule of teaching must include dedicated time in each session that allows for explicit links to the student’s assessment tasks to be made. After all, students could ask quite rightly: what is the point of teaching the subject matter if it bears no relation to their assessment?

Furthermore, the assessment criteria may be easily understood by academics, not so by students. These criteria need to be broken down for students and put in the context of the subject matter being taught to them. Again, this needs to be a process better started from the beginning of the teaching schedule as part of the weekly activity.

Students are individuals with different educational backgrounds and styles of learning. Understanding how one can support students at the individual level with their assessment journey requires time. This time is only realistically available in the taught sessions. A dedicated assessment session might be just the vehicle to get that individual time with your students and plot their own path to assessment success.

One element remains to be discussed. All of the teacher’s and student’s hard work comes to nothing if the assessment is not actually submitted. Taking students through the process of submitting the assessment, however familiar you think they are, is a must. Don’t fall down at the last hurdle!

Assessment is not going away any time soon – we need to get better at helping our students get it right the first time. As with everything, this can be best achieved through making sure that teaching assessment is part of our practice!

Weekly Brief

Read Also

Empowering Leadership through Innovation in Higher Education

Empowering Leadership through Innovation in Higher Education

Brian Fodrey, Assistant Vice President, Business Innovation, Carnegie Mellon University
The New Era of Education

The New Era of Education

Yrjö Ojasaar, Investment Partner, Change Ventures
Redefining Readiness: A Path Toward a Technology-Agnostic Future

Redefining Readiness: A Path Toward a Technology-Agnostic Future

Fatma Elshobokshy, Director of the Center for the Advancement of Learning (CAL), University of the District of Columbia
Pioneering STEM Education for a Future of Innovators

Pioneering STEM Education for a Future of Innovators

Jay Jessen, Director of the Marburger STEM Center, Lawrence Technological University (LTU)
The Indispensable Role of Emotional Intelligence in K-12 Technology Leadership

The Indispensable Role of Emotional Intelligence in K-12 Technology Leadership

Steve Richardson, Director of Information Technology, Homewood-Flossmoor High School
Tools over Solutions

Tools over Solutions

Gary Natriello, Professor of Sociology and Education & Ruth L. Gottesman, Chair in Educational Research, Teachers College Columbia University